A woman in her forties sits at a kitchen table in morning light, writing notes on a paper notepad beside an open laptop and a mug of coffee

Telehealth & Reviews

What happens at a GLP-1 “medical review” — and what a rubber-stamp intake looks like

By the US Health Digest editorial team · Published August 12, 2026 · Every claim linked to its primary source

Every GLP-1 telehealth program advertises a “medical review” before prescribing. Whether that review is a genuine clinical evaluation or a formality is the single most important thing to find out before you pay. The FDA-approved labels for Wegovy and Zepbound spell out exactly what a prescriber has to check: contraindications, pregnancy status, drug interactions, and conditions that require monitoring. An intake that never asks about them cannot be screening for them. The Federation of State Medical Boards' model telemedicine policy puts it bluntly: prescribing “based solely on static online questionnaires” is “not acceptable.”

This page goes deep on one step of the telehealth pipeline: the clinical evaluation itself. For the full journey — intake to first dose, pharmacy fulfilment, dose escalation, renewals — see our companion guide, how GLP-1 telehealth actually works.

The standard the evaluation is held to

A telehealth prescription is not held to a looser standard than an office visit. The Federation of State Medical Boards — the association of the state boards that license US physicians — adopted a model telemedicine policy in April 2022 stating that treatment decisions made virtually “will be held to the same standards of appropriate practice as those in in-person settings,” and that a documented medical evaluation and relevant clinical history — enough “to establish diagnoses and identify underlying conditions and/or contra-indications to the treatment” — must be obtained before any prescription is issued.

Two caveats keep this honest. First, the FSMB document is model policy — guidance that individual state boards adopt, adapt, or decline at their discretion — not a federal law. Second, the binding rules come state by state: the FSMB's board-by-board overview of telemedicine policies shows every state board requires physicians practicing telemedicine to be licensed (or registered) in the state where the patient is located, while the details of how a visit must be conducted vary considerably from state to state.

What a real GLP-1 evaluation has to cover

The clearest checklist for what a prescriber must consider is the FDA-approved prescribing information itself.

Eligibility

Both drugs are indicated alongside a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity — not instead of them — for adults with obesity, or adults with overweight plus at least one weight-related comorbid condition. The pivotal trials behind the weight-management indication defined those groups as BMI 30 or above, or BMI 27 to below 30 with a condition such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, or obstructive sleep apnea. An evaluation that never establishes your BMI and, if you are in the 27–30 range, never asks about a qualifying condition is not applying the indication.

The hard stops

Both labels carry the same boxed warning and the same contraindication: no prescribing for anyone with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma, or with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 — so the family-history question is the screening question for the boxed warning. Pregnancy is the other hard stop: both labels say the drugs may cause fetal harm and must be discontinued when pregnancy is recognized, and Wegovy's medication guide tells patients to stop the drug two months before a planned pregnancy. An evaluation that never asks a woman of reproductive age about pregnancy, breastfeeding, or pregnancy plans has skipped the question the label treats as decisive — our pregnancy and fertility explainer covers why.

The history that changes the plan

Beyond the hard stops, the labels' warnings sections define a history a prescriber needs in order to prescribe responsibly:

Side effects and how they are managed are their own subject — see our guide to GLP-1 side effects in women.

Video visit or questionnaire: does the format matter?

A synchronous visit happens in real time — video or phone. An asynchronous review means a clinician evaluates your written intake and message history on their own schedule. Asynchronous care is not inherently a rubber stamp: the FSMB model policy says a physician-patient relationship “may be established via either synchronous or asynchronous telemedicine technologies” so long as the standard of care is met. Whether your state's rules require more than that varies — the FSMB's state-by-state compilation runs ten pages of differing statutes — so we will not generalize. Format is not the test; the test is whether the questionnaire can come back with questions. The same FSMB policy draws exactly that line: physicians using adaptive questionnaires “must have the ability to ask follow-up questions or obtain further history,” and prescribing “based solely on static online questionnaires” is not acceptable.

The rubber-stamp intake: red flags

The FDA maintains a page on its concerns with unapproved GLP-1 drugs that includes the agency's own consumer warning signs and counts, as of May 31, 2026, 990 adverse event reports for compounded semaglutide and more than 730 for compounded tirzepatide — including dosing errors serious enough to require hospitalization. In March 2026 the agency warned 30 telehealth companies over illegal marketing of compounded GLP-1s; a third, quieter wave followed in June (our report). In the table below, each red flag is labeled by its basis — the FDA's stated concerns, the FSMB's model policy, or our own editorial judgment, marked plainly as such.

Red flag at the “medical review” stageWhy it mattersBasis
No screening and prescription by a licensed clinician required at allA warning sign the FDA itself tells consumers to avoid when obtaining these drugsFDA concerns page
No licensed clinician available to answer your questionsAlso on the FDA's list of warning signsFDA concerns page
Static questionnaire with no way for the reviewer to ask you anythingPrescribing on a static form alone is what the FSMB model policy calls not acceptableFSMB model policy
Intake never asks about thyroid cancer family history, pregnancy, medications, or pancreatitisThese map to the labels' contraindications, pregnancy warnings, and interaction warnings — unasked means unscreenedWegovy / Zepbound labels; our view on the inference
Marketing that presents the compounded product as the same as the FDA-approved drugThe central allegation in the FDA's warning letters to 30 telehealth companiesFDA warning letters
Prices far below every competitor, pitched as too good to pass upDeep-discount pricing is on the FDA's list of warning signs for unapproved productsFDA concerns page
“Approval” framed as the product — a plan and price quoted before anyone has reviewed your historyAn evaluation whose outcome is pre-sold is not an evaluation; real programs decline some applicantsOur view
No follow-up pathway: nobody named for side effects, mood changes, or dose questions after the saleThe labels' remaining monitoring instructions (retinopathy, hypoglycemia, gastrointestinal reactions) presume ongoing clinical contact; the mood-monitoring instruction was removed in 02/2026Our view, grounded in the current labels' monitoring language

What a real evaluation should ask you

Each question below traces to the label sections cited above. Expect to answer most of them:

Questions to ask before you pay

A program that answers these readily is behaving like a medical practice; one that treats them as friction is telling you what its “medical review” is for. For how specific programs handle this step, see our comparison of GLP-1 telehealth programs for women; for the questions to settle before starting at all, our GLP-1 FAQ.

Sources

  1. DailyMed. WEGOVY (semaglutide) — current Structured Product Label v19, published June 30, 2026. dailymed.nlm.nih.gov
  2. DailyMed. ZEPBOUND (tirzepatide) — current Structured Product Label v38, published May 6, 2026. dailymed.nlm.nih.gov
  3. FDA. FDA's Concerns with Unapproved GLP-1 Drugs Used for Weight Loss (adverse event counts as of May 31, 2026). fda.gov
  4. FDA. FDA Warns 30 Telehealth Companies Against Illegal Marketing of Compounded GLP-1s. Press announcement, March 3, 2026. fda.gov
  5. Federation of State Medical Boards. The Appropriate Use of Telemedicine Technologies in the Practice of Medicine. Adopted by the FSMB House of Delegates, April 2022. fsmb.org
  6. Federation of State Medical Boards. Telemedicine Policies: Board-by-Board Overview (last updated September 2024). fsmb.org
This article is for information only and is not medical advice. Prescription weight-loss medication requires evaluation by a licensed clinician. See our medical disclaimer.